Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
843-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

843-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.047904 50.858698)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.047805 50.858688,-1.047809 50.858707,-1.047823 50.858725,-1.047845 50.858739,-1.047872 50.858748,-1.047903 50.858751,-1.047934 50.858749,-1.047962 50.858740,-1.047984 50.858726,-1.047999 50.858709,-1.048004 50.858689,-1.047999 50.858670,-1.047986 50.858652,-1.047964 50.858638,-1.047936 50.858629,-1.047906 50.858626,-1.047875 50.858628,-1.047847 50.858637,-1.047825 50.858651,-1.047810 50.858668,-1.047805 50.858688)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL